Posted by eric (167.88.192.30) on November 30, 2002 at 10:42:25:
In Reply to: Re: I'm the victim, why should I have to pay? posted by Ken Young on November 30, 2002 at 04:19:12:
Ken,
Perhaps Amy does not wish to be contacted directly, and only wishes to recieve advice on this message board.
This should be a well known concept to you Ken, as your two biggest fans on your own message board post with false email addresses (XPrimeRican & Keith).
Are people trying to impersonate them?
Give your "answer" or "advice" (I use the term loosly) to Amy here, where she asked the question. It is not your place to question here on her email address.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: AMY.....
: If there is a police report of the accident, you are going to have to review it because although the report may show you as not causing the accident, the officer's report may indicate that there may have some "contributory negligence in causing the accident.
: I could not give you a exact answer to your question without seeing the police report.
: Oh by the way, I attempted to e-mail you this same information but a message came back to me indicating that no such e-mail address exists. I don't understand.
: Just speculating, but is there a possibility that someone is impersonating you?
: Ken Young
: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: : 10 months ago i was run off the road by a lunatic driver. this caused a pick-up truck to slam into me, totalling my BMW. Well, the lunatic driver's insurance co agreed to pay 75% (claiming most of the fault) and GEICO, the pick-up's co only 25% (even though thier customer actually hit me from behind). now when farmer's gave me the check for 75%, they wanted the title, so i gave it to them. but noe geico doesn't want to pay because they can't get the title to the car. it's been 10 months, and now they only want to pay 25% less what percentage the car brought at auction--they say farmer's is getting some money back on thier 75% because of the money from auction so they want the same kind of payback. now, the auction payed farmer's thier money, why should i lose money so that geico gets the same payback--that money should come from farmer's, shouldn't it??farmer's should give geico 25% of the amount the car sold for, not me!! how do i get this point across to these company's?? do i have a legal leg to stand on??? i'm the victim, i don't want to pay.
Follow Ups: