Subject: Re: Re: Re: Primerica is MLM by legal definition

Comments:
: I guess I dont need to reply to you Enrique, as Charlie and Careful Reader have already done so. : I guess you have been slapped back by the "Gauntlet". Again, I suggest you read posts carefully before replying. : ------------------------------------------------ : : : Sorry, but I disagree. Since you are whipping out your "LEGAL" stick, I'll address it from that perspective. : : 1) Is Primerica "any person, firm, corporation, or other business entity"? Yes. : : 2) Does PFS "sell, distribute, or supply for a valuable consideration goods or services" ? Yes. : : 3) Do they do 2) "through independent agents, contractors, or distributors at different levels"? Yes. : : 4) Can "such participants recruit other participants" ? Yes. : : 5) Are "commissions, cross-commissions, bonuses, refunds, discounts, dividends, or other considerations in the program paid as a result of the sale of such goods or services" ? Yes. : : 6) Are PFS reps paid for "the recruitment"? *No*. : : 7) Are PFS reps paid for the "actions, or performances of additional participants"? Yes. : : PFS fails point 6, therefore, LEGALLY (your word) its not an MLM. : : Yes, I admit I'm arguing semantics. But you started it. If you want to toss down the "LEGALESE" gauntlet, I dont mind picking it up and smacking you with it. I proved that one tiny phrase in your legal definition doesnt apply, therefore, in LEGAL terms, Primerica isn't an MLM. : : But, dont get me wrong. An MLM is a very good way to market products and services. I think it was smart for PFS to take some parts of the MLM business model and use them to their advantage. Every one knows that the biggest downside of real MLMs are that you have to pay to join, and that payment is paid to your recruiter, and thus is a form of incentive to recruit. Since that *fundamental* MLM mechanic *does not exist* at Primerica, it is not what anyone would consider an MLM by common definition. : : In addition, if you read JAXX reply in the other thread, he stated (and I quote): : : JAXX: "IF I HAVE A GOOD AGENT, I CAN INCREASE HIS COMMISSION. I MIGHT WANT HIM TO HIRE AGENT. I CAN GIVE HIM A 10% OVER-RIDE AND STILL MAKE MONEY." : : JAXX: "LET'S SAY THAT I HAVE A REP. THAT WANTS TO HIRE SOMEONE. HE CAN DO THAT. I CAN PAY THE RECRUITING REP. AN OVER-RIDE. I CAN INCREASE THE REPS. COMMISSIONS" : : That is no different than at Primerica, except that at Primerica, all the numerical details are already fixed and set into a pre-defined program, whereas Jaxx is "winging it" and doing it all by himself. So, according to YOUR definition of an MLM, If Primerica is an MLM, then Jaxx, and really, *EVERY* Financial Broker, is an MLM too! : : Hows that crow taste, by the way?

Please enter the characters in the image above.