Posted by Rene on December 02, 2004 at 09:28:34:
In Reply to: Re: Re: Primerica - Let's Have a REAL discussion posted by Rene Navarro on December 01, 2004 at 15:11:10:
: Interesing choice of words surrounding the discussion on Primerica. I, for one, am a District Representative for Primerica, and have both a Bachelor's and Master's Degree from a major university. What I find most interesting about the language used in determining whether Primerica is a scam or a legitimate company is the presumption that one will stike it rick quickly. What happens is that many people misinterpret a possibility as fact. The true nature and success of any business possibility is the extent to which one will commit to the mission of that business. What I have read thus far indicates that some individuals will never see the results of their labor when their commitment is questionable to begin with, and how serious one is about helping people. : Let me give some facts about the so-called legitimate companies that one critic mentioned in his complaint about Primerica. Anyone will agree that New York Life is a reputable company because of their wealth, business history and marketing efforts. This reputable company through one of its agents was at the verge of convincing a close personal acquintance of purchasing a cash value insurance (I refer to all cash value insurances as junk insurance) for $268 per month at a face value death benefit protection of $300,000. To my surprise this family required more coverage, and I ran the numbers to customize their insurance needs with what they could afford. I secured a term life policy at a face value to cover all liablities, assets, college funds, and yes, an income if one of the policy holders were to pass at the true amount of $468,000 in coverage for $78/month. This is a fraction of the cost that New York Life was quoting this family. Legitimate transactions, different results. Who is facilitating the scam in this scenario? : I have done the same for families that have been duped by MetLife, American General, Edward Jones, etc..Simply put, I can go on for days describing my experience and COMMITMENT to what Primerica does. : Yes, the culture of this company is different. You do not see agents at other firms "high fiving" each other. And yes the presentation appear more like an infomercial. I understand how this could be misperceived, but I got past all that. I got to work and I am living proof that I have helped over 35 families in six months get back on track with their finances by educating them on how they can reduce debt, invest in their future and become financially independent. More importantly, I have helped families get out of the insurance scams that these so called legitimate companies have sold to clients that were already strapped financially. By the way, I have not quit my job and Primerica is done on a part time basis. So far my commissions have nearly topped what I make at my regular (secure, huh!) job. : Primerica is a legitimate business for those who want to work and not expect for results to fall on their laps. I was required to take all the same exams that agents at other firms are required to take and the company trains us on business compliance policies and ethical practices. I have not found a reason to question my involvement with Primerica. ****You quote cost, why didn't you look at a lower cost policy? You replaced a perm product. Did you ask why they had that product? What happens if they become uninsurable in the later years? You didn't say if they had a long term saving plan in effect. Term is a great product, but it's not so easy just to quote a term against a perm. product. People are living longer and they arn't saving all that much. So when the client gets to later age and has a low or no pension, what will they say when they start looking at their estate. At the very least, the clients children could have taken over the policy. What will the term renewals be in 20-30 years? PFS has been around for years and I don't see the masses of people who have become massive savers. The rule of 72 is a good concept, but a divorce a job loss or a disability can throw all that out of the window. Middle incomers have a limited amout of money to work with. It's great to say buy only term now, but look at all the people who lost income in the down market. Some don't have time to get it back so what will they pass on to their children? An expensive term renewal or a burial bill. You say you can replace all day, well if you know anything about term shopping, you need to be on the lookout for for agents with access to many other companies.. Go to www.term4sale.com and do a quote against what you sold. We all know you do what's right 100% of the time. I'm sure you will do the right thing.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|