|
[Home] [Insurance Quotes] [Follow Ups] [Post Followup]
[Insurance and Annuity Message Board] [FAQ]
Contact your carrier directly for personal account information.
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Primerica Debate posted by Beaker on February 02, 2003 at 02:06:04: If Jaxx is a broker, then the validity of your statements (Beaker) are even more suspect. Jaxx could be involved not just one, but all four of the situations I listed, with different companies. "To make the assumption that the only reason brokers sell term is to convert it later is farsical." I didn't make that assumption. However, I stated that that is one of the ths things that happens in many cases and therefore could be something that Jaxx is involved in. You made the assumption that I was "assuming". "1,2,3, & 4 are wrong." You still have failed to prove your statement. Prove definately that these four conditions don't exist, or that Jaxx is in no way involved with 1,2,3, & 4, and maybe you will have a point, I will await your evidence. (documents, signed statements, even articles from credible financial magazines...) "Lots of companies offer level premium and level coverage amount, have better (yes better) financial ratings than Primerica, and lots of people just buy term." Just because this is the case (and "lots" is a very relative term) doesn't mean that Jaxx isn't necessarily involved in 1,2,3,& 4 and it certainly doesn't mean that those things don't happen. I also would suspect Jaxx to be involved in something like 1,2,3, &4 because as he said himself, he sells VUL policies which are in almost all cases bad for clients, always risky, but good for commissions. Lastly,
|