Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Deceptive Practices?

Comments:
: : : -Primerica is not an MLM. : : : -Merril Lynch advisors wont even talk with you unless you have 200k : : : -Primerica was the only Insurance company to pay out all its claims on 9/11. : : 1) It is well known and documented that I confused the terms "pyramid" and "MLM". Pyramids are illegal, MLMs are not. I have now stated that, oh, like, I dont know, maybe 100 times on public boards? Its ok, though, you can pretend you didnt hear/read me say it and try and make it seem like I'm a liar, but really, it just proves you to be a liar. After all, if you already read that I mixed up the terms in a previous thread, and then you claim what you did above, that makes you deceptive, and thus, a liar. Yay! Way to discredit yourself! Man, dude, let me do some of the work of crushing you! Dont defeat yourself! : >>>>>I remember you said you confused MLM and Pyramid. The fact is, you fought tooth and nail that Primerica was not MLM, after repeated messages telling you you were wrong. You stated things as fact that were not fact. Maybe you, as a "financial services professional" (I use that term loosely) should do a bit of homework or a little research before you open your mouth....this seems to be a common trait of Primerica reps, and actually proves my point. : 1 for 1 for eric. : : 2) Its a fact that Merril Lynch targets only clients that have over $200k to invest. To my knowledge, I've not only proven that, but you havent disproven it. Dude, thats 2 for 2. Please, let me argue with you and defeat you, stop, like, you know, defeating yourself. : >>>>>I dont need to disprove anything. YOU stated it as fact, so prove it. I missed the post where you had proven that point...oh yes, that is because you NEVER proved that point. Is that just another Enrique lie? I and any other REAL financial professional knows it isnt true, but you just blindly believe your upline, proving my point that you blindly believe and regurgitate your uplines lies. Where is your proof? You have none?....well, I guess that makes it 2 for 2 for eric! : : 3) I have seen evidence that PFS paid all 9/11 claims, including a claim that wasnt even on file yet (I personally talked to the woman that held the application) yet I have not seen similar evidence for any other company. If another company did, then I'm wrong. Being wrong is not the same thing as lying. Lying is knowing the truth and saying something different that the truth. Claiming that I lied is, in fact, deceptive on YOUR part. You have no evidence that I knew the truth (or even know the truth) about the claims paid on 9/11 by other companies. If you find any evidence that any other company paid all its claims for that tragic day, the only thing you can POSSIBLY say to me is that I'm wrong. To take it to the next step and say I lied requires you to have evidence that I knew my statement was wrong BEFORE I made it. And since you have none, then calling me a liar makes YOU the deceptive person. : >>>>>You said Primerica was the ONLY company to pay out all its claims. That statement is STILL FALSE, and you are STILL LYING! So, by not seeing evidence that all other companies paid claims, it is OK to say they didnt? Dude, you use really faulty logic. This one is a no brainer....3 for 3 for eric. : Enrique, I am glad you are posting again. I miss taking a certain individual to school, and teaching them a thing or two. I used to crush HWSRN in debates, making him look like a fool...the funny thing is, he just didnt realize how uneducated he was in the financial services industry, and didnt realize how horrible it made him look to his peers here on this board. Im glad you are picking up HWSRN's torch when it comes to skill and logic, and carrying it on into the ignorant sunset. : : Damn, Eric, 3 for 3. I just kicked your butt. You should really learn to keep your mouth shut, because you know I will always embarass you. : >>>>>Yes, HWSRN#2, you sure kicked my butt. You have shown absolutely ZERO evidence to back your claims and statements. Pretty weak. If you ever want to debate on ANY financial subject, including Primerica.....just let me know, and I will wipe the floor with you Ken Jr. : : : But its ok, because I have evidence of you admitting, publically, on a message board, that you are biased against Primerica. You wrote the words, and signed it. I kept the link to it. Once you admitted, yourself, that you are biased, you instantly destroyed your own credibility. No one will believe a word you say about PFS after that admission. : >>>>>So? I am biased against Primerica, and judging by your lack of knowledge and lying, I have good reason to. : Take care Junior, and just let me know when you are ready to have me mop the floor with you. But please at least TRY to have some supporting facts next time, OK Junior?

Please enter the characters in the image above.