New York State has taken an aggressive approach to auditing like-kind exchanges and applying federal guidance and case law to those audits. The Department of Taxation frequently scrutinizes closing statements and other financial records to uncover inconsistencies and unreported income, particularly in reverse and build-to-suit exchanges.
Clawbacks in New York
While there is no specific clawback for 1031 exchanges in tax statutes, New York’s claw-back practice has been observed in audits. In the case where a 1031 exchange is completed, and a loan is taken to access tax-free funds while avoiding capital gains taxes, excess loan proceeds are treated as boot and taxable. New York has audited refinances before and after 1031 exchanges, often using Schedule L from Forms 1120S and 1065 to identify non-compliant transactions.
RETT and Reverse Exchanges
In New York, reverse exchanges do not trigger the Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT) because the replacement property is initially acquired by an Exchange Accommodation Titleholder (EAT) and later transferred to the taxpayer. Since the taxpayer funds the EAT and only receives the deed after selling the relinquished property, they are not considered to have purchased the replacement property directly, thus avoiding the RETT.
Drop-and-Swap Exchange in New York
on June 12, 2025, New York’s Division of Tax Appeals gave its blessing to at-closing drop-and-swaps for 1031 exchanges. That’s right: New York has now formally acknowledged what many advisors have been cautiously whispering for years—that you don’t need to hold title for months on end to get 1031 treatment.
The decision couldn’t be clearer:
“There is no authority for the proposition that title to the property must be held for more than one day.”
Translation?
- No Holding Period Required: The ruling states, "There is no authority for the proposition that title to the property must be held for more than one day." This means partners can exchange their undivided interests without an arbitrary waiting period.
- Alignment with Established Precedents: The decision aligns with the logic from Bolker v. Commissioner and supports the IRS-approved principle that a tax-free exchange can occur immediately after acquisition or just before disposition, focusing on intent rather than time held.
- Simplification of Exchange Structures: This ruling eliminates the need for complex, multi-step structures previously used to navigate perceived holding period requirements, promoting more straightforward and compliant exchanges.